On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 13:07 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (23/03/23 17:18), Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Mike most likely stumbled upon it while running LTP. > > Yeah, I'm curious if anyone uses zram in preempt-rt systems. I don't > mind this patch but would be nice to add new code when it solves some > real problems. Maybe `depend on !PREEMPT_RT` can be a better option. Patchlet's job here is only obese config RT vs !RT testing. It can always move back into local_patches, it won't be lonely ;-) -Mike
