On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:12:33AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 2/16/23 9:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Looks good: > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > > >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.10+ > > > > But why is this a stable candidate? > > Only because the other patches depend on it. But none of those is stable material either as I can tell. It's a fairly simple and nice to have enhancement, but not really a grave bug or regression fix.
