On 11/29/22 8:00 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 11/29/22 6:28 AM, hch@xxxxxx wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 04:18:19AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: >>>> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>> >>> perhaps a block tree since it has block/scsi/nvme ? >> >> I think Mike has SCSI work that builds on top of this, and reservations >> ar originally a SCSI feature. But either block or scsi is fine with >> me. > > I'm fine with scsi or block, I'm assuming we won't have any > conflicts from this on the block/nvme side? This patchset has no conflicts with anyone's trees right now. I have more patchsets that also touch the block, scsi and nvme layers that build on this set. The future patches are more heavy on the scsi side if that makes a difference. > > If we're doing block just let me know and I can queue it up. >
