On 11/25/22 18:48, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Mike, > >> The following patches were made over Linus's tree and allow the >> PR/pr_ops users to handle errors without having to know the device >> type and also for SCSI handle devices that require the sense >> code. Currently, we return a -Exyz type of error code if the PR call >> fails before the drivers can send the command and a device specific >> error code if it's queued. The problem is that the callers don't >> always know the device type so they can't check for specific errors >> like reservation conflicts, or transport errors or invalid operations. >> >> These patches add common error codes which callers can check for. > > This looks OK to me. Not sure which tree makes the most sense to funnel > this through? > > Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> > perhaps a block tree since it has block/scsi/nvme ? -ck
