Re: [PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:10:00 -1000
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20221017020011.25016-6-shikemeng@huawei.com>
References: <20221017020011.25016-1-shikemeng@huawei.com> <20221017020011.25016-6-shikemeng@huawei.com>

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:00:08AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> There is no iocg_pd_init function. The pd_alloc_fn function pointer of
> iocost policy is set with ioc_pd_init. Just correct it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

References:
- [PATCH 0/8] A few cleanup and bugfix patches for blk-iocost
  - From: Kemeng Shi
- [PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init
  - From: Kemeng Shi

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/8] blk-iocost: Remove vrate member in struct ioc_now
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/8] blk-iocost: Remove redundant initialization of struct ioc_gq
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init
Next by thread: [PATCH 6/8] blk-iocost: Avoid to call current_hweight_max if iocg->inuse == iocg->active
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux