[PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is no iocg_pd_init function. The pd_alloc_fn function pointer of
iocost policy is set with ioc_pd_init. Just correct it.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-iocost.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index 761295ed9c5a..96c1571a8a1d 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -2880,7 +2880,7 @@ static int blk_iocost_init(struct gendisk *disk)
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
 
 	/*
-	 * rqos must be added before activation to allow iocg_pd_init() to
+	 * rqos must be added before activation to allow ioc_pd_init() to
 	 * lookup the ioc from q. This means that the rqos methods may get
 	 * called before policy activation completion, can't assume that the
 	 * target bio has an iocg associated and need to test for NULL iocg.
-- 
2.30.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux