On Fri, Sep 02 2022 at 8:02P -0400, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2022-09-02 02:28, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23 2022 at 8:18P -0400, > > Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Introduce a new target type DM_EMULATED_ZONES for targets with > >> a different number of sectors per zone (aka zone size) than the underlying > >> device zone size. > >> > >> This target type is introduced as the existing zoned targets assume > >> that the target and the underlying device have the same zone size. > >> The new target: dm-po2zone will use this new target > >> type as it emulates the zone boundary that is different from the > >> underlying zoned device. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This patch's use of "target type" jargon isn't valid. > > > > Please say "target feature flag" and rename DM_EMULATED_ZONES to > > DM_TARGET_EMULATED_ZONES in the subject and header. > > Good catch. I will fix it up for the next version. > > But, with those fixed: > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > You mean <Reviewed-By> ? :) Ah, yes Reviewed-By, force of habit ;)
