On 2022-09-02 02:28, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23 2022 at 8:18P -0400, > Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Introduce a new target type DM_EMULATED_ZONES for targets with >> a different number of sectors per zone (aka zone size) than the underlying >> device zone size. >> >> This target type is introduced as the existing zoned targets assume >> that the target and the underlying device have the same zone size. >> The new target: dm-po2zone will use this new target >> type as it emulates the zone boundary that is different from the >> underlying zoned device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch's use of "target type" jargon isn't valid. > > Please say "target feature flag" and rename DM_EMULATED_ZONES to > DM_TARGET_EMULATED_ZONES in the subject and header. > Good catch. I will fix it up for the next version. > But, with those fixed: > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > You mean <Reviewed-By> ? :) > (fyi, I'll review patch 13, the dm-po2zone target, tomorrow) > Thanks.
