Hi Bart, On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 9:02 AM Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On 6/23/22 20:43, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 3:06 AM Bart Van Assche wrote: > >> > >> Improve static type checking by using the enum req_op type for variables > >> that represent a request operation and the new blk_opf_t type for > >> variables that represent request flags. > >> > >> Cc: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> fs/nilfs2/btnode.c | 4 ++-- > >> fs/nilfs2/btnode.h | 5 +++-- > >> fs/nilfs2/mdt.c | 3 ++- > >> include/trace/events/nilfs2.h | 4 ++-- > >> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > I've checked this patch, picking up some of the block layer patches needed > > to understand this conversion from the list of linux-block. > > Hi Ryusuke, > > Thank you for the quick review. > > Does "picking up" perhaps mean that you plan to send a subset of this > patch series to Linus yourself? I prefer that the entire patch series is > sent to Linus by a single kernel maintainer. Sorry for the misleading wording. That just means that I tracked and confirmed the related block layer patches in the series to properly review this patch. I recognize that the entire patch series should be sent through the same maintainer. Regards, Ryusuke Konishi
