Re: [PATCH] block: bfq: Remove an unused function definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: bvanassche@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: bfq: Remove an unused function definition
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:50:08 -0600
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, jack@xxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220617204433.102022-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
References: <20220617204433.102022-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:44:33 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch is the result of the analysis of a sparse report.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] block: bfq: Remove an unused function definition
      commit: 7a338b43ef4b023ce8eb9ee38cc78491b06b16a1

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe

References:
- [PATCH] block: bfq: Remove an unused function definition
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] block: bfq: Fix kernel-doc headers
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] block: bfq: Fix kernel-doc headers
Previous by thread: [PATCH] block: bfq: Remove an unused function definition
Next by thread: [PATCH] block: bfq: Fix kernel-doc headers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux