On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:38:50AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 09:53:12PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 05:24:04PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > I do have CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH=y but I also have: > > > > > > I'd suggest to ignore broken tests that require a deprecated option > > > that will eventually be removed. > > > > CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH will eventually be nuked? > > You'll only get a single namespace without it once the phaseout is > complete, yes. OK so CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH will be nuked, but the module parameter will remain, and if the module parameter is used with multipath=N you'll end up with a single namespace once the phase out of CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH is complete. > If you want nvme multipathing you'll need it, which > is the story since day one. Sounds good. > If Bart wants to test dm-multipath I think his earlier srp_tests are > the much better choice. OK thanks for the heads up. Luis
