On giovedì? 31 marzo 2022 07:45:12 CEST Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The temptation was to call device_unregister() which is a combined > > device_del(); device_put(); but when the device_initialize() and > > device_add() are called separately, then I think it is more readable to > > call del and put separately as well. > > I think we should also consolidate the initialization side. Using > device_register and device_unregister would have prevented this bug > and I should have switched to that before refactoring the code. > If I don't misunderstand what you wrote, I think you mean something like the following changes: diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c index a390679cf458..7a000a9a9dbe 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c @@ -3431,7 +3431,7 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev) sdkp->disk_dev.class = &sd_disk_class; dev_set_name(&sdkp->disk_dev, "%s", dev_name(dev)); - error = device_add(&sdkp->disk_dev); + error = device_register(&sdkp->disk_dev); if (error) { put_device(&sdkp->disk_dev); goto out; @@ -3474,7 +3474,7 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev) error = device_add_disk(dev, gd, NULL); if (error) { - put_device(&sdkp->disk_dev); + device_unregister(&sdkp->disk_dev); goto out; } @Dan, @Christoph: what do you think of the changes that I've copy-pasted above? Thanks, Fabio M. De Francesco