On 10/18/21 9:14 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:41:30AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> Ok, here the splitt makes sense. That being said I'd rather only add >>> what is nvme_poll_cq as a separate function here, and I'd probably >>> name it __nvme_process_cq as the poll name could create some confusion. >> >> Sure, I can shuffle that around. Can I add your reviewed/acked by with >> that for those two, or do you want the series resent? > > I'm fine with that change included: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Great, thanks. -- Jens Axboe
