On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:41:30AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Ok, here the splitt makes sense. That being said I'd rather only add > > what is nvme_poll_cq as a separate function here, and I'd probably > > name it __nvme_process_cq as the poll name could create some confusion. > > Sure, I can shuffle that around. Can I add your reviewed/acked by with > that for those two, or do you want the series resent? I'm fine with that change included: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
