Re: [PATCH] block-mq: fix comments in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping...

在 2020/9/19 11:54, yangerkun 写道:
'f5bbbbe4d635 ("blk-mq: sync the update nr_hw_queues with
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter")' introduce a bug what we may sleep between
rcu lock. Then '530ca2c9bd69 ("blk-mq: Allow blocking queue tag iter
callbacks")' fix it by get request_queue's ref. And 'a9a808084d6a ("block:
Remove the synchronize_rcu() call from __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues()")'
remove the synchronize_rcu in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues. We need
update the confused comments in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter.

Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  block/blk-mq-tag.c | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 32d82e23b095..051227bd5a03 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -398,9 +398,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
  	/*
  	 * __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() updates nr_hw_queues and queue_hw_ctx
  	 * while the queue is frozen. So we can use q_usage_counter to avoid
-	 * racing with it. __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() uses
-	 * synchronize_rcu() to ensure this function left the critical section
-	 * below.
+	 * racing with it.
  	 */
  	if (!percpu_ref_tryget(&q->q_usage_counter))
  		return;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux