Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] block: change REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET from 6 to 13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/17/20 7:30 AM, Coly Li wrote:
On 2020/5/16 23:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 09:05:39PM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
On 2020/5/16 20:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 08:44:45PM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
Yes you are right, just like REQ_OP_DISCARD which does not transfer any
data but changes the data on device. If the request changes the stored
data, it does transfer data.

REQ_OP_DISCARD is a special case, because most implementation end up
transferring data, it just gets attached in the low-level driver.


Yes, REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET and REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL are quite similar to
REQ_OP_DISCARD. Data read from the LBA range of reset zone is not
suggested and the content is undefined.

For bcache, similar to REQ_OP_DISCARD, REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET and
REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL are handled in same way: If the backing device
supports discard/zone_reset, and the operation successes, then cached
data on SSD covered by the LBA range should be invalid, otherwise users
will read outdated and garbage data.

We should treat REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET and REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL being in
WRITE direction.

No, the difference is that the underlying SCSI/ATA/NVMe command tend to
usually actually transfer data.  Take a look at the special_vec field
in struct request and the RQF_SPECIAL_PAYLOAD flag.


Then bio_data_dir() will be problematic, as it is defined,
  52 /*
  53  * Return the data direction, READ or WRITE.
  54  */
  55 #define bio_data_dir(bio) \
  56         (op_is_write(bio_op(bio)) ? WRITE : READ)

For the REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET bio, bio_data_dir() will report it as READ.

Since the author is you, how to fix this ?


Well, but I do think that Coly is right in that bio_data_dir() is very unconvincing, or at least improperly documented.

I can't quite follow Christoph's argument in that bio_data_dir() reflects whether data is _actually_ transferred (if so, why would REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE() be marked as WRITE?) However, in most cases bio_data_dir() will only come into effect if there are attached bvecs.

So the _correct_ usage for bio_data_dir() would be to check if there is data attached to the bio (eg by using bio_has_data()), and only call bio_data_dir() if that returns true. For false you'd need to add a switch evaluating the individual commands.

And, btw, bio_has_data() needs updating, too; all the zone commands are missing from there, too.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke            Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx                               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux