Re: [PATCH v13 00/12] Inline Encryption Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/12] Inline Encryption Support
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:04:08 -0400
Cc: Satya Tangirala <satyat@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fscrypt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Barani Muthukumaran <bmuthuku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kuohong Wang <kuohong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kim Boojin <boojin.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200514051053.GA14829@sol.localdomain> (Eric Biggers's message of "Wed, 13 May 2020 22:10:53 -0700")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <20200514003727.69001-1-satyat@google.com> <20200514051053.GA14829@sol.localdomain>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux)

Eric,

> Then patches 6-12 can go upstream via the SCSI and fscrypt trees in
> the following release.

I'd like our UFS folks to review the UFS patches. But otherwise no
objection from me.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

References:
- [PATCH v13 00/12] Inline Encryption Support
  - From: Satya Tangirala
- Re: [PATCH v13 00/12] Inline Encryption Support
  - From: Eric Biggers

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: Fix io_opt limit setting
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/6] blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug(simplified version)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v13 00/12] Inline Encryption Support
Next by thread: [PATCH] block: fix build failure in case of !CONFIG_BLOCK
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]