On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 08:12:21PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-04-09 14:45, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > blk_put_queue() puts decrements the refcount for the request_queue
> ^^^^
> can this word be left out?
Sure.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > index 8b1cab52cef9..46fee1ef92e3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > @@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ struct request_queue {
> > #define QUEUE_FLAG_PCI_P2PDMA 25 /* device supports PCI p2p requests */
> > #define QUEUE_FLAG_ZONE_RESETALL 26 /* supports Zone Reset All */
> > #define QUEUE_FLAG_RQ_ALLOC_TIME 27 /* record rq->alloc_time_ns */
> > +#define QUEUE_FLAG_DEFER_REMOVAL 28 /* defer queue removal */
> >
> > #define QUEUE_FLAG_MQ_DEFAULT ((1 << QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT) | \
> > (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP))
> > @@ -648,6 +649,8 @@ bool blk_queue_flag_test_and_set(unsigned int flag, struct request_queue *q);
> > #else
> > #define blk_queue_rq_alloc_time(q) false
> > #endif
> > +#define blk_queue_defer_removal(q) \
> > + test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEFER_REMOVAL, &(q)->queue_flags)
>
> Since blk_queue_defer_removal() has no callers the code that depends on
> QUEUE_FLAG_DEFER_REMOVAL to be set will be subject to bitrot. It would
> make me happy if the QUEUE_FLAG_DEFER_REMOVAL flag and the code that
> depends on that flag would be removed.
Sure thing.
Feedback on the cover letter thread patch 0/5 about whether or not to
consider userspace impact changes on these changes should be detailed on
the commit log would be useful.
> Please add a might_sleep() call in blk_put_queue() since with this patch
> applied it is no longer allowed to call blk_put_queue() from atomic context.
Sure thing.
Luis
