On 27/03/2020 12:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Because the two variants are rather pointless. And this might get > more people to actually pass a useful node ID instead of copy and > pasting some old example code. So then everybody will copy the NUMA_NO_NODE ones and in X years someone will come up with a wrapper passing in NUMA_NO_NODE to blk_alloc_queue_node(), because he/she didn't read the commit history. But if I'm the only one objecting to it, Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
