On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 18:54, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 21:54, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 16:43, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Try to restore the value for the cache flush timeout, by updating the > > define MMC_CACHE_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MS to 10 * 60 * 1000". > > I have increased the timeout to 10 minutes but it did not help. > Same error found. > [ 608.679353] mmc1: Card stuck being busy! mmc_poll_for_busy > [ 608.684964] mmc1: cache flush error -110 > [ 608.689005] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector > 4302400 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x20800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 > > OTOH, What best i could do for my own experiment to revert all three patches and > now the reported error gone and device mount successfully [1]. > > List of patches reverted, > mmc: core: Specify timeouts for BKOPS and CACHE_FLUSH for eMMC > mmc: block: Use generic_cmd6_time when modifying > INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD > mmc: core: Default to generic_cmd6_time as timeout in __mmc_switch() > > [1] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/1238275#L4346 > > - Naresh Thanks for testing! This sounds a bit weird, I must say. Also, while looking into the logs, it seems like you are comparing a v5.5 kernel with v5.6-rc2, but maybe I didn't read the logs carefully enough. In any case, I am looking into creating a debug patch so we can narrow down the problem a bit further. Kind regards Uffe
