Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 0/2] Fix misuse of blk_rq_stats in blk-iolatency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I claim, that there is a bug, that hopefully doesn't show itself apart
from a minor disabled optimisation. It's _too_ easy to misuse, and if
somebody try to reuse, this could lead to quite interesting issues.

Could somebody at last take a look?
Thanks

On 25/07/2019 00:35, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote:
> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> There are implicit assumptions about struct blk_rq_stats, which make
> it's very easy to misuse. The first patch fixes consequences, and the
> second employs type-system to prevent recurrences.
> 
> Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (2):
>   blk-iolatency: Fix zero mean in previous stats
>   blk-stats: Introduce explicit stat staging buffers
> 
>  block/blk-iolatency.c     | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  block/blk-stat.c          | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  block/blk-stat.h          |  9 ++++--
>  include/linux/blk_types.h |  6 ++++
>  4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Yours sincerely,
Pavel Begunkov

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux