Re: [GIT PULL] Block fixes for 5.3-rc2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/26/19 11:56 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Guys, what happened to the wrong sector boundary and max sector mess?
> 
> There are at least two different issues (with one of them having two
> proposed fixes);
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/1563896932.3609.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1563895995.3609.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1563839144.2504.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> but I don't actually seem to have a pull request for any of this.
> 
> The
> 
>     dma_max_mapping_size(dev) << SECTOR_SHIFT
> 
> this in scsi_lib.c is clearly completely wrong, and is still there in my tree.
> 
> The virt_boundary_mask thing can apparently be fixed other ways too
> (ie questionable whether it should be fixed in block/blk-settings.c or
> in drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c, but I don't see either one. I was
> expecting the block/blk-settings.c one to be in this pull request.
> 
> Maybe I'm missing some alternate fix? I don't think so, particularly
> since I still see the wrong-way shift, at least.
> 
> Is this due to some confusion about who is supposed to fix it?
> Christoph was involved in both, issues, and the problems came throigh
> different trees (ie block tree for the virt_boundary_mask, scsi with
> the

The fix is sitting in the SCSI tree:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=1b5d9a6e98350e0713b4faa1b04e8f239f63b581

so hopefully it'll be pushed upstream in time for -rc2...

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux