Re: [PATCH BUGFIX V2] block, bfq: fix operator in BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Il giorno 24 giu 2019, alle ore 18:12, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
> 
> On 6/22/19 2:44 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> By mistake, there is a '&' instead of a '==' in the definition of the
>> macro BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY. This commit replaces the wrong operator with
>> the correct one.
> 
> A bit worrying that this wasn't caught in testing, as it would have
> resulted in _any_ queue being positive for totally seeky?
> 

Fortunately there's a somewhat reassuring explanation.  The commit
introducing this macro prevented seeky queues from being considered
soft real-time.  And, to be more selective, it actually filtered out
only totally seeky queues, i.e., queues whose last I/O requests are
*all* random.  With this error, any seeky queue was considered totally
seeky.  This the broke (only) selectivity.

> Anyway, applied.
> 

Thanks,
Paolo

> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux