On 05/26/2019 04:49 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> If the device is setup with ioctl we can resize the device after the
> initial setup, but if the device is setup with netlink we cannot use the
> resize related ioctls and there is no netlink reconfigure size ATTR
> handling code.
>
> This patch adds netlink reconfigure resize support to match the ioctl
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> V2:
> - Merge reconfig and connect resize related code to helper and avoid
> multiple nbd_size_set calls.
>
> drivers/block/nbd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index 053958a8a2ba..d75b67c12392 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -1674,6 +1674,21 @@ nbd_device_policy[NBD_DEVICE_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
> [NBD_DEVICE_CONNECTED] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> };
>
> +static void nbd_genl_set_size(struct genl_info *info, struct nbd_device *nbd)
> +{
> + struct nbd_config *config = nbd->config;
> + u64 bsize = config->blksize;
> + u64 bytes = config->bytesize;
> +
> + if (info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_SIZE_BYTES])
> + bytes = nla_get_u64(info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_SIZE_BYTES]);
> +
> + if (info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_BLOCK_SIZE_BYTES])
> + bsize = nla_get_u64(info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_BLOCK_SIZE_BYTES]);
> +
> + nbd_size_set(nbd, bsize, div64_u64(bytes, bsize));
> +}
> +
I'm sorry. I do not know what I am thinking. Ignore this patch too. It
is bad. It will always be called in the reconfig case.
