Re: [PATCH] block: print offending values when cloned rq limits are exceeded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Chaitanya for the review.  I was not sure what Jens would think
about the checkpatch warning, so I left it as it was so he could
decide.  I tried to model the value output after that old 'bio too
big' error.  Thanks again.

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:17 PM Chaitanya Kulkarni
<Chaitanya.Kulkarni@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think it will be useful to print the information along with the error.
>
> Do we want to address the checkpatch warnings ?
>
> WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_err([subsystem]dev, ... then
> dev_err(dev, ... then pr_err(...  to printk(KERN_ERR ...
> #20: FILE: block/blk-core.c:1202:
> +               printk(KERN_ERR "%s: over max size limit. (%u > %u)\n",
>
> WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_err([subsystem]dev, ... then
> dev_err(dev, ... then pr_err(...  to printk(KERN_ERR ...
> #31: FILE: block/blk-core.c:1216:
> +               printk(KERN_ERR "%s: over max segments limit. (%hu > %hu)\n",
>
> In either case,
>
> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@xxxxxxx> .
>
> On 5/23/19 2:49 PM, John Pittman wrote:
> > While troubleshooting issues where cloned request limits have been
> > exceeded, it is often beneficial to know the actual values that
> > have been breached.  Print these values, assisting in ease of
> > identification of root cause of the breach.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Pittman <jpittman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   block/blk-core.c | 7 +++++--
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> > index 419d600e6637..af62150bb1ba 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-core.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> > @@ -1199,7 +1199,9 @@ static int blk_cloned_rq_check_limits(struct request_queue *q,
> >                                     struct request *rq)
> >   {
> >       if (blk_rq_sectors(rq) > blk_queue_get_max_sectors(q, req_op(rq))) {
> > -             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: over max size limit.\n", __func__);
> > +             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: over max size limit. (%u > %u)\n",
> > +                     __func__, blk_rq_sectors(rq),
> > +                     blk_queue_get_max_sectors(q, req_op(rq)));
> >               return -EIO;
> >       }
> >
> > @@ -1211,7 +1213,8 @@ static int blk_cloned_rq_check_limits(struct request_queue *q,
> >        */
> >       blk_recalc_rq_segments(rq);
> >       if (rq->nr_phys_segments > queue_max_segments(q)) {
> > -             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: over max segments limit.\n", __func__);
> > +             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: over max segments limit. (%hu > %hu)\n",
> > +                     __func__, rq->nr_phys_segments, queue_max_segments(q));
> >               return -EIO;
> >       }
> >
> >
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux