On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:34:29AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > Doh! Didn't hit that in testing, but point taken. > > > Also reset still may come during activating FW, is that a problem? > > IO timeout and user initiated resets should be avoided. A state machine > addition may be useful here. Yep. It almost sounds like we'd want a PAUSED state where resets just keep returning RESET_TIMER without any other action.
