Re: fix nr_phys_segments vs iterators accounting v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 07:20:56PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/20/19 7:17 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 01:09:39AM +0000, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 5/20/19 5:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> Jens,
> >>>
> >>> is this ok for 5.2?  If not we need to hack around the sector
> >>> accounting in nvme, and possibly virtio.
> >>
> >> I'd rather do it right in 5.2, especially if we can get something
> >> acceptable cobbled together this week.
> > 
> > If this patchset will be merged to 5.2, please remove the following
> > two lines from patch 1:
> > 
> > Fixes: b35ba01ea697 ("nvme: support ranged discard requests")
> > Fixes: 1f23816b8eb8 ("virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support")
> > 
> > 
> > Because the patch 1 doesn't fix them actually.
> 
> I don't want to merge something unless you are happy with it as well.
> Are you fine with going this route?

I am fine with this route, and just try to make the commit log not
misleading.


Thanks,
Ming



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux