Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: initialize the write priority in blk_rq_bio_prep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxx>, Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: initialize the write priority in blk_rq_bio_prep
From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 16:34:00 +0900
Cc: "ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx" <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matias Bjorling <mb@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cms-type: 102P
Dlp-filter: Pass
In-reply-to: <20190513063754.1520-6-hch@lst.de>
References: <20190513063754.1520-6-hch@lst.de> <20190513063754.1520-1-hch@lst.de> <CGME20190513063855epcas5p33ef8c4c0a0055bd0b66eadc859796f0f@epcms2p6>
Reply-to: minwoo.im@xxxxxxxxxxx

> The priority fiel also make sense for passthrough requests, so
                           ^^^^
                       `s/fiel/field`
I think it's trivial so that it can be done with merging.

References:
- [PATCH 05/10] block: initialize the write priority in blk_rq_bio_prep
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- fix nr_phys_segments vs iterators accounting
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] bfq: backport: update internal depth state when queue depth changes
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] block: preserve BIO_REFFED flag in bio_reset()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/10] block: mark blk_rq_bio_prep as inline
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: fix infinite wait in khread_park() on io_finish_async()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux