On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 02:27:10PM -0700, Ming Lei wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 05:36:32PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 5:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Looking at current peak testing, I've got around 1.2% in queue enter > > > and exit. It's definitely not free, hence my question. Probably safe > > > to assume that we'll double that cycle counter, per IO. > > > > Okay, that's not negligible at all. I don't know of a faster reference > > than the percpu_ref, but that much overhead would have to rule out > > having a per hctx counter. > > Or not using any refcount in fast path, how about the following one? Sure, I don't think we need a high precision completion wait in this path, so a delay-spin seems okay to me. > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 3ff3d7b49969..6fe334e12236 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -2199,6 +2199,23 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags, > return -ENOMEM; > } > > +static void blk_mq_wait_hctx_become_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, > + int dead_cpu) > +{ > + unsigned long msecs_left = 1000 * 10; > + > + while (msecs_left > 0) { > + if (blk_mq_hctx_idle(hctx)) > + break; > + msleep(5); > + msecs_left -= 5; > + } > + > + if (msecs_left > 0) > + printk(KERN_WARNING "requests not completed from " > + "CPU %d\n", dead_cpu); > +} > + > /* > * 'cpu' is going away. splice any existing rq_list entries from this > * software queue to the hw queue dispatch list, and ensure that it > @@ -2230,6 +2247,14 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node) > spin_unlock(&hctx->lock); > > blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true); > + > + /* > + * Interrupt for this queue will be shutdown, so wait until all > + * requests from this hctx is done or timeout. > + */ > + if (cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) > + blk_mq_wait_hctx_become_idle(hctx, cpu); > + > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h > index d704fc7766f4..935cf8519bf2 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.h > +++ b/block/blk-mq.h > @@ -240,4 +240,15 @@ static inline void blk_mq_clear_mq_map(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap) > qmap->mq_map[cpu] = 0; > } > > +static inline bool blk_mq_hctx_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) > +{ > + struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->sched_tags ?: hctx->tags; > + > + if (!tags) > + return true; > + > + return !sbitmap_any_bit_set(&tags->bitmap_tags.sb) && > + !sbitmap_any_bit_set(&tags->bitmap_tags.sb); > +} > + > #endif > > Thanks, > Ming