Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx requests on CPU unplug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:23:27PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/5/19 3:59 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Managed interrupts can not migrate affinity when their CPUs are offline.
> > If the CPU is allowed to shutdown before they're returned, commands
> > dispatched to managed queues won't be able to complete through their
> > irq handlers.
> > 
> > Introduce per-hctx reference counting so we can block the CPU dead
> > notification for all allocated requests to complete if an hctx's last
> > CPU is being taken offline.
> 
> What does this do to performance? We're doing a map per request...

It should be the same cost as the blk_queue_enter/blk_queue_exit that's
also done per request, which is pretty cheap way to count users. I
don't think I'm measuring a difference, but my test sample size so far
is just one over-powered machine.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux