Re: [RFC/PATCH net-next 0/9] net/dim: Support for multiple implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:34:27AM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> > It doesn't sound reasonable that we have per-ULP feature (DIM is
> > per-ULP) to be configured globally. Especially given the fact that
> > users can find themselves running different workloads with different
> > requirements on the same system.
> >
> > Currently each ULP has some sort of tool to configure itself and I think
> > that once ULP is converted to use DIM, it should have on/off knob in the
> > tool used by their users.
>
> Its not any different than socket options that can have a global sysctl
> knob that can be overridden by individual socket consumers.

Right, but there is a major difference between socket example and
your proposal.

Combination of socket option with general knob gives you maximum
versatility in order to disable/enable/configure through program
or through some sensible default. In your proposal, you will limit
yourself to some system wide default, without any ability to override
it specifically for your load.

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux