Re: [RFC/PATCH net-next 0/9] net/dim: Support for multiple implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




As we discussed, let's check with RDMA maintainers if it's better to extend alloc_cq API or create alloc_cq_dim API function.

Sagi/Christoph,

how about adding a module param per ULP ? as we use register_always today, create a use_dimm module param for iSER/NVMe-RDMA ?

I would say that its better (and simpler) to do a global sysctl knob for
it. No need for a per-ULP param for a starting point.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux