On 02/20/2019 10:04 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:23:53PM -0800, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> tests/nvme/002.out | 4996 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 2498 insertions(+), 2498 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/nvme/002.out b/tests/nvme/002.out >> index aa71d8f..abecda5 100644 >> --- a/tests/nvme/002.out >> +++ b/tests/nvme/002.out >> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ >> Running nvme/002 >> >> -Discovery Log Number of Records 1000, Generation counter 1000 >> +Discovery Log Number of Records 1000, Generation counter 2000 >> =====Discovery Log Entry 0====== >> trtype: loop >> adrfam: pci >> subtype: nvme subsystem >> -treq: not specified >> +treq: not specified, sq flow control disable supported >> portid: X >> trsvcid: >> subnqn: blktests-subsystem-0 > > [snip] > > Why did this output change? An nvme-cli change, or a kernel change, or > something else? And will this now fail with older versions of nvme-cli > or the kernel instead? > This change is specific to nvme-cli only. It should fail on older cli versions, we want latest cli/tools to be used when running these testcases so that all the latest tools are also been tested for the compliance, else we might be running tests with any bugs with older version(s) which are fixed already. Actually I'd like to add quick nvme-cli version check at the start of each test that will certainly help/force user to have a latest version.