Re: [PATCH] block: Fix a WRITE SAME BUG_ON

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Resending as plain text, apologies.

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:23 PM John Dorminy <jdorminy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Adding dm-devel since it involves LVM.
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:14 PM Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> If the lvm is stacked by different logical_block_size disks,
>> when WRITE SAME on it, will bug_on:
>>
>> kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/sd.c:968!
>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
>> CPU: 11 PID: 525 Comm: kworker/11:1H Tainted: G           O      5.0.0-rc3+ #2
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-2.fc27 04/01/2014
>> Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
>> RIP: 0010:sd_init_command+0x7aa/0xdb0
>> Code: 30 75 00 00 c7 85 44 01 00 00 18 00 00 00 0f 85 fa 04 00 00 48 83 c4 40 48
>>       89 df 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f e9 b6 ca fe ff <0f> 0b 41 bc 09
>> RSP: 0018:ffffb55f80ddbca0 EFLAGS: 00010206
>> RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: ffff9ed23fb927a0 RCX: 000000000000f000
>> RDX: ffff9ed23f0a8400 RSI: ffff9ed27bc79800 RDI: 0000000000000000
>> RBP: ffff9ed23fb92680 R08: ffff9ed27c8c0000 R09: ffff9ed23fb927d8
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff9ed27bc79800
>> R13: ffff9ed2787a0000 R14: ffff9ed27bdf3400 R15: ffff9ed23fb927a0
>> FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ed27c8c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: 00007f6b14cf9341 CR3: 0000000069058000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> Call Trace:
>>  ? vp_notify+0x12/0x20
>>  scsi_queue_rq+0x525/0xa30
>>  blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x8d/0x580
>>  ? syscall_return_via_sysret+0x10/0x7f
>>  ? elv_rb_del+0x1f/0x30
>>  ? deadline_remove_request+0x55/0xc0
>>  blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x76/0x110
>>  blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xf9/0x170
>>  __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x51/0xd0
>>  process_one_work+0x195/0x380
>>  worker_thread+0x30/0x390
>>  ? process_one_work+0x380/0x380
>>  kthread+0x113/0x130
>>  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
>>  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>> Modules linked in: alloc(O+)
>> ---[ end trace dc92ddeb2e6d1fe5 ]---
>>
>> The logical_block_size of the LVM is the max value of the sub disks,
>> it maybe different with one of the sub disk. when WRITE SAME on the
>> disk, it will BUG_ON when setup WRITE SAME cmd.
>>
>> Close WRITE_SAME feature on the LVM if it was stacked by different
>> logical_block_size disk.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-settings.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
>> index 3e7038e475ee..e1695155ad61 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
>> @@ -537,6 +537,10 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
>>                 }
>>         }
>>
>> +       /* If the logical block size is different, forbid write same */
>> +       if (t->logical_block_size != b->logical_block_size)
>> +               t->max_write_same_sectors = 0;
>> +
>>         t->logical_block_size = max(t->logical_block_size,
>>                                     b->logical_block_size);
>>
>> --
>> 2.14.4
>>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux