Re: [PATCH] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




If you mean the real huge page, this patch shouldn't have made a difference
because bio_vec->bv_offset is in [0, PAGE_SIZE), and iSer sets virt
boundary as 4K - 1.

However, things will change after multipage bvec is introduced.


Hi Ming,

I've received a blktrace from our customer showing the issue [1].

In this example trace they've submitted (contiguous) 64K I/Os and
without this patch, they're seeing a lot of splits as indicated by the
trace.

With the patch applied the I/O is directly issued to the LLDD without
the splits.

[1] http://beta.suse.com/private/jthumshirn/blktrace.txt


This patch makes sense to me. However I agree that we need to clarify
that this addresses cases where PAGE_SIZE-1 > queue_virt_boundary(q).

And also, lets replace "like iser" with "drivers that sets a virtual
boundary constraint" as nvme-rdma does the same thing.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux