Re: [PATCH] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/11/2018 13:01, Ming Lei wrote:
> If you mean the real huge page, this patch shouldn't have made a difference
> because bio_vec->bv_offset is in [0, PAGE_SIZE), and iSer sets virt
> boundary as 4K - 1.
> 
> However, things will change after multipage bvec is introduced.


Hi Ming,

I've received a blktrace from our customer showing the issue [1].

In this example trace they've submitted (contiguous) 64K I/Os and
without this patch, they're seeing a lot of splits as indicated by the
trace.

With the patch applied the I/O is directly issued to the LLDD without
the splits.

[1] http://beta.suse.com/private/jthumshirn/blktrace.txt

Byte,
	Johannes
-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                        SUSE Labs
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux