On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33:51AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/30/18 11:22 AM, Keith Busch wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:09:04AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> Pretty trivial, below. This also keeps the queue mapping calculations > >> more clean, as we don't have to do one after we're done allocating > >> IRQs. > > > > Yep, this addresses my concern. It less efficient than PCI since PCI > > can usually jump straight to a valid vector count in a single iteration > > where this only subtracts by 1. I really can't be bothered to care for > > optimizing that, so this works for me! :) > > It definitely is less efficient than just getting the count that we > can support, but it's at probe time so I could not really be bothered > either. > > Can I add your reviewed-by? Yes, please. Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx> > -- > Jens Axboe
