Re: [PATCH] brd: Allow ramdisk to be allocated on selected NUMA node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/14/18 2:32 PM, Adam Manzanares wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/14/18 9:09 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:33:35 -0600
>> Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/14/18 9:29 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 08:47:33 -0600
>>>> Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>> On 6/14/18 7:38 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>>>> For performance reasons we should be able to allocate all memory
>>>>>> from a given NUMA node, so this patch adds a new parameter
>>>>>> 'rd_numa_node' to allow the user to specify the NUMA node id.
>>>>>> When restricing fio to use the same NUMA node I'm seeing a
>>>>>> performance boost of more than 200%.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks fine to me. One comment.
>>>>>   
>>>>>> @@ -342,6 +343,10 @@ static int max_part = 1;
>>>>>>   module_param(max_part, int, 0444);
>>>>>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_part, "Num Minors to reserve between
>>>>>> devices");
>>>>>> +static int rd_numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>>>>>> +module_param(rd_numa_node, int, 0444);
>>>>>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(rd_numa_node, "NUMA node number to allocate RAM
>>>>>> disk on.");
>>>>>
>>>>> This could feasibly be 0644, as there would be nothing wrong with
>>>>> altering this at runtime.
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>> While we could it would not change the allocation of _existing_ ram
>>>> devices, making behaviour rather unpredictable.
>>>> Hence I did decide against it (and yes, I actually thought about
>>>> it).
>>>>
>>>> But if you insist ...
>>>
>>> Right, it would just change new allocations. Probably not a common use
>>> case, but there's really nothing that prevents it from being feasible.
>>>
>>> Next question - what does the memory allocator do if we run out of
>>> memory on the given node? Should we punt to a different node if that
>>> happens? Slower, but functional, seems preferable to not being able
>>> to get memory.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm. That I haven't considered; yes, that really sounds like an idea.
>> Will be sending an updated patch.
> 
> Will numactl ... modprobe brd ... solve this problem?

It won't, pages are allocated as needed.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux