Re: [PATCH v11 0/7] block, scsi, md: Improve suspend and resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Then,

Reported-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On čtvrtek 9. listopadu 2017 17:55:58 CET Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/09/2017 09:54 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 07:16 +0100, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> >> is this something known to you, or it is just my fault applying this
> >> series to v4.13? Except having this warning, suspend/resume works for
> >> me:
> >> 
> >> [   27.383846] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
> >> [   27.383976] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Starting disk
> >> [   27.451218] sdb: Attempt to allocate non-preempt request in
> >> preempt-only
> >> mode.
> >> [   27.459640] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >> [   27.464521] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 172 at block/blk-core.c:823
> >> blk_queue_enter+0x222/0x280> 
> > Hello Oleksandr,
> > 
> > Thanks for the testing. The warning that you reported is expected. Maybe
> > it
> > should be left out to avoid that users get confused.
> 
> If the warning is expected, then it should be removed. It'll just confuse
> users and cause useless bug reports.
> 
> > Jens, this patch series still applies cleanly on top of your
> > for-4.15/block
> > branch. Are you fine with this patch series or do you perhaps want me to
> > repost it with Oleksandr's Tested-by tag added to each patch?
> 
> Since you need to kill the warning anyway, let's get it respun.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux