On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 07:16 +0100, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > is this something known to you, or it is just my fault applying this series to > v4.13? Except having this warning, suspend/resume works for me: > > [ 27.383846] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk > [ 27.383976] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Starting disk > [ 27.451218] sdb: Attempt to allocate non-preempt request in preempt-only > mode. > [ 27.459640] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 27.464521] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 172 at block/blk-core.c:823 blk_queue_enter+0x222/0x280 Hello Oleksandr, Thanks for the testing. The warning that you reported is expected. Maybe it should be left out to avoid that users get confused. Jens, this patch series still applies cleanly on top of your for-4.15/block branch. Are you fine with this patch series or do you perhaps want me to repost it with Oleksandr's Tested-by tag added to each patch? Thanks, Bart.
