Re: [PATCH V2 11/20] blk-mq: introduce helpers for operating ->dispatch list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 14:56 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +static inline bool blk_mq_has_dispatch_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> +	return !list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_mq_add_rq_to_dispatch(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +		struct request *rq)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +	list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
> +	blk_mq_hctx_set_dispatch_busy(hctx);
> +	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_mq_add_list_to_dispatch(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +		struct list_head *list)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +	list_splice_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
> +	blk_mq_hctx_set_dispatch_busy(hctx);
> +	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_mq_add_list_to_dispatch_tail(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +						    struct list_head *list)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +	list_splice_tail_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
> +	blk_mq_hctx_set_dispatch_busy(hctx);
> +	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_mq_take_list_from_dispatch(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +		struct list_head *list)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +	list_splice_init(&hctx->dispatch, list);
> +	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}

Same comment for this patch: these helper functions are so short that I'm not
sure it is useful to introduce these helper functions.

Bart.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux