Christoph, >> But as we already set no_report_opcodes for all usb-storage and >> quirked uas devices I think the worst offenders are already covered >> anyway. > > Martin, how do we want to move ahead on this patch? I was suggesting the VPD because that may be easier for the SAS HBA vendors to accommodate for SATA passthrough. But we can cross that bridge when we get to it. For libata I'm fine with keying off a supports_opal:1 flag in scsi_device or something to that effect. I'd just like to reduce the risk of introducing more RSOC regressions. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
