On 05/26/2017 03:20 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 05/26/2017 03:17 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 07:26 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 05/25/2017 05:38 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>> Requests that got stuck in a block driver are neither on
>>>> blk_mq_ctx.rq_list nor on any hw dispatch queue. Make these
>>>> visible in debugfs through the "busy" attribute.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
>>>> index 8b06a12c1461..70a2b955afee 100644
>>>> --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
>>>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
>>>> @@ -370,6 +370,30 @@ static const struct seq_operations hctx_dispatch_seq_ops = {
>>>> .show = blk_mq_debugfs_rq_show,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +struct show_busy_ctx {
>>>> + struct seq_file *m;
>>>> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static void hctx_show_busy(struct request *rq, void *data, bool reserved)
>>>> +{
>>>> + const struct show_busy_ctx *ctx = data;
>>>
>>> Let's not call that variable 'ctx', in blk-mq that's pretty much
>>> reserved for the sw queues.
>>
>> Hello Jens,
>>
>> How about renaming show_busy_ctx into show_busy_params and ctx into params?
>
> I think that would be an improvement. Also, this:
>
> blk_mq_debugfs_rq_show(ctx->m, &rq->queuelist);
>
> doesn't look safe at all, as you are passing in a node instead of a
> head. I think you just want to use __blk_mq_debugfs_rq_show() here.
I guess it's safe as we don't iterate the list, but it's pointless
though. Just use __blk_mq_debugfs_rq_show().
--
Jens Axboe
