Re: [PATCH 4/5] blk-mq-debugfs: Show busy requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:20 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 05/26/2017 03:17 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 07:26 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 05/25/2017 05:38 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > Requests that got stuck in a block driver are neither on
> > > > blk_mq_ctx.rq_list nor on any hw dispatch queue. Make these
> > > > visible in debugfs through the "busy" attribute.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > > > index 8b06a12c1461..70a2b955afee 100644
> > > > --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > > > +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > > > @@ -370,6 +370,30 @@ static const struct seq_operations hctx_dispatch_seq_ops = {
> > > >  	.show	= blk_mq_debugfs_rq_show,
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > > +struct show_busy_ctx {
> > > > +	struct seq_file		*m;
> > > > +	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx	*hctx;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static void hctx_show_busy(struct request *rq, void *data, bool reserved)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	const struct show_busy_ctx *ctx = data;
> > > 
> > > Let's not call that variable 'ctx', in blk-mq that's pretty much
> > > reserved for the sw queues.
> > 
> > Hello Jens,
> > 
> > How about renaming show_busy_ctx into show_busy_params and ctx into params?
> 
> I think that would be an improvement. Also, this:
> 
> 	blk_mq_debugfs_rq_show(ctx->m, &rq->queuelist);
> 
> doesn't look safe at all, as you are passing in a node instead of a
> head. I think you just want to use __blk_mq_debugfs_rq_show() here.

Hello Jens,

That change will make the compiler perform type checking. I agree that's
an improvement. I will make that change.

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux