On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 8:37 AM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 09:34:42AM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote: > [...] > > > The rest Rust code changes look good to me. Although I would suggest you > > > to split this patch into several patches: you can do the conversion from > > > "as" pattern to provenance API one file by one file, and this make it > > > easier for people to review. And after the conversions are done, you can > > > introduce the Makefile changes. > > > > I think it's fine to do several of the `as` conversions in a single > > Well, "fine" != "recommended", right? ;-) If the patch was split, > reviewers would be able to give Reviewed-by to individual patches that > looks fine trivially. Then it's easier to make progress every iteration, > and also allows partially applying the changes. Of course it doesn't > have to be file-by-file. I sent v4 a little while ago, hopefully the resulting complexity is manageable now that the build system is untouched. Cheers. Tamir