Re: [PATCHv3 4/7] block: Introduce a dedicated lock for protecting queue elevator updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2/24/25 10:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There's weird upper case for the first character after block.  I know
> some subsystems like this, but in general try to at least be consistent
> for the series.
> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * attributes which require some form of locking
>> +	 * other than q->sysfs_lock
> 
> Make that a proper sentence:
> 
> 	 * Attributes which require some form of locking
> 	 * other than q->sysfs_lock.
> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * protects elevator switch/update
>> +	 */
> 
> Also make this a full sentence, and mention which fields this protects.
> 
> Otherwise looks good.

Okay, I'll incorporate above comments in the next patchset.

Thanks,
--Nilay




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux