On 2/18/25 10:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:44:44PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote: >> So now if you suggest keeping only ->store and do away with ->store_nolock >> method then we have to move feeze-lock inside each attributes' corresponding >> store method as we can't keep freeze-lock under ->store in queue_attr_store(). > > Yes, that's what I suggested in my previous mail: > > "So I think part of that prep patch should > also be moving the queue freezing into ->store and do away with > the separate ->store_nolock" > > Alright, I'm addressing this in the the next patchset. Thanks, --Nilay
