On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:44:44PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote: > So now if you suggest keeping only ->store and do away with ->store_nolock > method then we have to move feeze-lock inside each attributes' corresponding > store method as we can't keep freeze-lock under ->store in queue_attr_store(). Yes, that's what I suggested in my previous mail: "So I think part of that prep patch should also be moving the queue freezing into ->store and do away with the separate ->store_nolock"
