On 03/01/2025 08:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 08:23:02AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
- better to not have unused gaps
Who cares?
it's not that important, as long as it the flags are properly ordered
and it's obvious where the gaps are
> >> - catch missing blk-mq debugfs array names
- this has been a problem in the past
Again who really cares?
People who use blk-mq debugfs
And maybe the maintainer when we have the tedious routine of a new flag
being added but the debugfs entry being missed and then the follow on
patch (to add the entry).
Cons:
- boilerplate
Anyway, I feel too strongly about all of this.
