On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 03:05:48PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 05:40:56AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:52:51AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > The local copy can be updated in any way with any data, so does another > > > concurrent update on q->limits really matter? > > > > Yes, because that means one of the updates get lost even if it is > > for entirely separate fields. > > Right, but the limits are still valid anytime. > > Any suggestion for fixing this deadlock? What is "this deadlock"?
